← Back to Technology & Equity Overview
The Perfect Storm
Between 1990 and 2025, Moses Lake School District experienced TWO simultaneous transformations:
- Demographic: 76% white → 70% Hispanic
- Technological: Paper tests → 100% digital learning
These weren't separate events. They happened TOGETHER, creating compounding disadvantages that multiply with each passing year.
The Mathematics of Compounding Barriers
How Barriers Multiply (Not Add)
If barriers ADDED, the calculation would be:
Language barrier (30% disadvantage) + Technology barrier (20% disadvantage) = 50% total disadvantage
But barriers MULTIPLY, so the actual calculation is:
Language barrier (0.70 success rate) × Technology barrier (0.80 success rate) = 0.56 success rate = 44% disadvantage
Add a third barrier (poverty = no home internet), and it compounds further:
0.70 × 0.80 × 0.75 = 0.42 success rate = 58% disadvantage
This is why achievement gaps persist despite billions in education funding. We're adding resources, but barriers are multiplying.
The Evolution of Barriers (1997-2025)
1997: Paper Tests Era
White Student, English-Speaking, Middle-Class
- ✅ Takes WASL test on paper
- ✅ Textbooks in English (native language)
- ✅ Parents can help with homework
- ✅ Success barriers: ZERO
Expected success rate: 100%
Hispanic Student, ELL, Low-Income
- ❌ Takes WASL test on paper (in English, second language)
- ❌ Textbooks in English (struggling to comprehend)
- ✅ No technology required (can complete work)
- ❌ Parents can't help (don't speak English)
Barriers: Language (1)
Expected success rate: ~70%
2005: Internet Homework Era
White Student, English-Speaking, Middle-Class
- ✅ Internet homework assigned
- ✅ Has home broadband ($50/month affordable)
- ✅ Parents can help navigate websites
- ✅ Success barriers: ZERO
Expected success rate: 100%
Hispanic Student, ELL, Low-Income
- ❌ Internet homework assigned (in English)
- ❌ NO home broadband ($50/month unaffordable)
- ❌ Parents can't help (language + no internet)
- ❌ Uses library (closes 6pm, homework incomplete)
Barriers: Language + Poverty + No Internet (3)
Expected success rate: ~42%
2015: Computer Testing Era (Smarter Balanced)
White Student, English-Speaking, Middle-Class
- ✅ Takes Smarter Balanced on computer
- ✅ Types essays (has computer skills)
- ✅ Practices at home (has computer + internet)
- ✅ Parents familiar with technology
- ✅ Success barriers: ZERO
Expected success rate: 100%
Hispanic Student, ELL, Low-Income
- ❌ Takes Smarter Balanced (in English, on computer)
- ❌ Types essays (limited typing skills)
- ❌ Can't practice at home (no computer + no internet)
- ❌ Parents can't help (language + technology barriers)
Barriers: Language + Technology + Poverty + No Home Practice (4)
Expected success rate: ~30%
2018: Google Classroom Era
White Student, English-Speaking, Middle-Class
- ✅ All assignments on Google Classroom
- ✅ Has Chromebook + home internet
- ✅ Parents check Google Classroom daily
- ✅ Can email teacher with questions
- ✅ Success barriers: ZERO
Expected success rate: 100%
Hispanic Student, ELL, Low-Income
- ❌ Assignments on Google Classroom (in English)
- ❌ Has Chromebook, NO home internet
- ❌ Parents can't check Google Classroom (no English + no internet)
- ❌ Can't email teacher (no home internet)
- ❌ Homework incomplete, grades drop
Barriers: Language + Technology + Poverty + Parent Engagement Impossible (5)
Expected success rate: ~25%
March 2020: COVID Remote Learning
White Student, English-Speaking, Middle-Class
- ✅ Logs into Zoom from home
- ✅ Has reliable high-speed internet
- ✅ Has quiet room for studying
- ✅ Parents home to supervise (work from home)
- ✅ Stays on track academically
Expected success rate: 85% (COVID affected everyone, but less severe)
Hispanic Student, ELL, Low-Income
- ❌ Can't log into Zoom (NO home internet)
- ❌ School parking lot WiFi (in car, no desk)
- ❌ Shares room with 3 siblings (no quiet space)
- ❌ Parents working essential jobs (agriculture, food processing - NOT home)
- ❌ Falls months behind, may never catch up
Barriers: Language + Technology + Poverty + No Internet + Parents Working + No Space (6)
Expected success rate: ~10%
The Achievement Gap Data
What the Numbers Show
| Year |
Assessment |
White Students Meeting Standard |
Hispanic Students Meeting Standard |
Achievement Gap |
| 2006 |
WASL (Paper) |
~65% |
~40% |
25 points |
| 2015 |
Smarter Balanced (Computer) - Year 1 |
~55% |
~28% |
27 points |
| 2019 |
Smarter Balanced (Pre-COVID) |
~58% |
~30% |
28 points |
| 2022 |
Smarter Balanced (Post-COVID) |
~50% |
~22% |
28 points |
| 2024 |
Smarter Balanced (Latest) |
~52% |
~24% |
28 points |
The gap never closes. It persists at 25-28 points across nearly 20 years.
Why the Gap Persists
Not because Hispanic students are less capable.
Because the barriers keep multiplying:
- 1997: 1 barrier (language)
- 2005: 3 barriers (language + poverty + no internet)
- 2015: 4 barriers (+ computer skills required)
- 2020: 6 barriers (+ COVID compounds everything)
Achievement gaps are STRUCTURAL, not individual. The system creates the gap.
What COVID Revealed
The Students Who Fell Off the Grid
March 2020: Schools close
Who disappeared immediately:
- Students without home internet: ~20% of enrollment
- Disproportionately Hispanic: ~75-80% of those without internet
- Disproportionately low-income: 90%+ qualify for free/reduced lunch
What happened to them:
- Weeks passed without contact
- No Zoom attendance
- No homework submitted
- Teachers emailed - no response (no internet to check email)
- District called families - parents working, couldn't answer
- Some families didn't speak English, couldn't understand messages
Emergency responses:
- District distributed hotspots (ran out, waiting lists)
- School parking lots opened for WiFi (degrading, unsafe)
- McDonald's parking lots (students doing homework in cars)
- Libraries closed (COVID restrictions)
By June 2020:
- Some students returned (got hotspots)
- Some never came back (moved, dropped out)
- Most were 3-6 months behind academically
- Many are STILL behind in 2024
Learning Loss That May Be Permanent
| Grade in March 2020 |
Expected Learning Loss |
Status in 2024 |
| Kindergarten → 4th grade |
Missed critical reading foundation |
Reading below grade level, may never catch up |
| 5th grade → 9th grade |
Missed 6 months of instruction |
Behind in all subjects, struggling in high school |
| 10th grade → Graduated 2022 |
Missed junior year preparation |
Lower college enrollment, lower test scores |
| 11th/12th grade → Graduated 2021 |
Missed senior year, no graduation ceremony |
Many didn't attend college, entered workforce immediately |
The Compound Effect Over Time
Student A: All Advantages
Profile: White, English-speaking, middle-class family, home internet since 2000
1997 (Kindergarten): Learns to read, parents read to them nightly
2000 (3rd grade): Takes WASL on paper, scores proficient
2005 (8th grade): Internet homework, has home computer, completes all assignments
2010 (High school): Uses Google for research, types essays, strong GPA
2015 (Graduates): Takes SAT on computer, scores well, attends university
2019 (Age 22): College degree, enters middle-class workforce
2024 (Age 27): Career established, owns home, raises family with advantages
Barriers faced: ZERO. Advantages compound over lifetime.
Student B: All Disadvantages
Profile: Hispanic, ELL, low-income family, NO home internet until 2021 (hotspot during COVID)
1997 (Kindergarten): Learns to read, but in English (second language), slower progress
2000 (3rd grade): Takes WASL on paper, struggles with English, scores below standard
2005 (8th grade): Internet homework assigned, NO home internet, uses library (closes 6pm), homework often incomplete, grades drop
2010 (High school): Google Classroom required, still NO home internet, falls further behind, C/D grades
2015 (Should graduate): Doesn't pass graduation requirements, stays 5th year
2016 (Age 19): Finally graduates (5 years), doesn't attend college, works in food processing
2020 (Age 23): COVID hits, loses job temporarily, has young child, still no home internet
2024 (Age 27): Works same job as 2016, child entering school, cycle may repeat
Barriers faced: 6+ compounding over entire childhood. Disadvantages compound over lifetime.
Could This Have Been Prevented?
What If Districts Had Acted in 1998?
1998: Internet homework begins
What districts COULD have done:
- Provide universal hotspots to families without internet
- Partner with ISPs for subsidized home service
- Keep paper alternatives for homework
- Extend library hours for students
- Hire bilingual staff to help families navigate technology
Cost: ~$100-200K/year for district the size of Moses Lake
Benefit: Prevented 26-year homework gap, narrowed achievement gaps, improved graduation rates
Why Didn't They?
Possible explanations:
- "Not our responsibility" - Parents should provide internet, not schools
- Budget constraints - Couldn't find $200K in tight budgets
- Didn't see the compounding effect - Focused on devices, not access
- Assumed infrastructure would improve - "Eventually everyone will have internet"
- Siloed thinking - Tech department focused on school infrastructure, not home access
- Wrong metrics - Measured device counts, not homework completion barriers
- Didn't connect to demographics - Saw two separate problems, not one compounding crisis
What Could Be Done Now?
Immediate Actions (2025)
| Action |
Cost |
Impact |
Timeline |
| Universal Hotspots |
$225K/year |
Solves homework gap immediately for 1,580 students |
1 month to deploy |
| District-Provided Home Internet |
$150-200K/year |
Better than hotspots, faster, more reliable |
3-6 months to partner with PUD |
| Bilingual Tech Support |
$60K/year |
Helps families navigate signup, troubleshooting |
1 month to hire |
| Parent Tech Training |
$20K/year |
Builds confidence, reduces barriers |
Ongoing workshops |
| Paper Homework Alternatives |
$10K/year |
Backup for students still without internet |
Immediate |
TOTAL: ~$300-350K/year to solve the access problem completely
Compare to: Annual technology budget ~$500K, Total district budget ~$150M
This is 0.2% of the total budget. Technically trivial. Politically difficult.
Final Analysis: The Perfect Storm
Why This Happened
It wasn't ONE thing. It was the COMBINATION:
1. Demographic transformation (1990-2025):
- 76% white → 70% Hispanic in one generation
- ELL students: 5% → 25%
- Poverty: 30% → 58%
2. Technology revolution (1998-2025):
- Internet homework begins (1998)
- Computer testing mandatory (2015)
- Learning management systems (2014-2020)
- 1:1 devices (2019-20)
- COVID remote learning (2020)
3. The timing was catastrophic:
- 2010: Moses Lake crosses to Hispanic majority
- 2015: Computer testing becomes mandatory
- 2020: COVID hits, exposing everything
4. The barriers compounded:
- Language × Technology × Poverty × Parent Barriers = 10-25% success rate
- Achievement gaps that may be permanent
- Generational disadvantage
The Bottom Line
What We Know
- ✅ Demographics transformed rapidly (1990-2025)
- ✅ Technology demands exploded (1998-2025)
- ✅ Transformations happened simultaneously (perfect storm)
- ✅ Barriers compound exponentially (not linearly)
- ✅ Achievement gaps persist (25-28 points, 20 years)
- ✅ COVID exposed what was already broken (system failed before pandemic)
- ✅ 19% still lack home internet (26-year homework gap continues)
- ✅ Solutions exist and are affordable ($300K = 0.2% of budget)
- ✅ Districts haven't implemented them (policy choice, not resource constraint)
What Needs to Happen
- Acknowledge the compounding effect - Stop treating language, technology, and poverty as separate issues
- Prioritize home internet access - Universal hotspots or district-provided service
- Bilingual support for families - Tech support, parent training, translated materials
- Measure the right things - Homework completion, not device counts
- Commit resources - $300K/year is pocket change compared to $150M budget
- Act with urgency - Every year we wait, another cohort falls behind permanently