Education Policy: Values, Rights, and the Law

Understanding Washington State Requirements and Private School Freedom

Sex Education, Transgender Policies, Religious Rights, and School Choice

Purpose of This Page

Washington State has become a focal point in national debates about education, values, and parental rights. Topics like sex education content, transgender student policies, LGBTQ+ curriculum requirements, and religious freedom in education generate strong feelings across the political spectrum.

This page provides factual information about what Washington State law actually requires, where different types of schools have freedom, and where constitutional protections apply. Our goal is to help community members understand the legal landscape without dismissing anyone's deeply-held values or concerns.

Important Context: Washington State is considered one of the most progressive states on these issues. The I-5 corridor (Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia) controls state politics and has enacted laws that reflect progressive values. Many communities in Eastern Washington hold different values but are subject to these same state laws. This creates real tension.

Our Approach: This page presents the facts about what the law requires while acknowledging that people of good faith disagree strongly about whether these laws are right or wrong. Understanding the law doesn't mean you must agree with it.

Current Washington State Law for PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Public schools (including charter schools) are subject to extensive state requirements. Here's what the law currently mandates:

📚 Comprehensive Sex Education (Senate Bill 5395)

Requirements (effective 2022-23 school year):

What "inclusive" means in practice:

Parental Rights:

🚻 Transgender Student Policies (Required by January 2020)

All public school districts must:

Current Federal-State Conflict (2025): The Trump administration has challenged these policies and threatened to withhold federal funding. The U.S. Department of Education is investigating OSPI for "requiring school boards to adopt policies that allow males to participate in female sports and occupy female-only intimate facilities." Washington State has vowed to maintain its policies despite federal pressure. This conflict is ongoing and unresolved.

🏳️‍🌈 LGBTQ+ Curriculum Requirements (Enacted 2024)

All public schools must:

⚖️ Civil Rights Protections

Under Washington Law Against Discrimination:

What About PRIVATE SCHOOLS?

This is where the picture changes dramatically. Private schools in Washington State have significantly more freedom than public schools on these issues.

What Private Schools Are NOT Required To Do:

What Private Schools ARE Required To Do:

Key Point: Private schools have the constitutional right to teach from their religious perspective and are explicitly exempt from most of the progressive policies required in public schools. This is why many families seeking alternatives to public school policies choose private schools.

What About CHARTER SCHOOLS?

Charter schools are a critical case because some people mistakenly think they're like private schools. They are not.

Charter Schools Are PUBLIC SCHOOLS

This means charter schools MUST:

Bottom Line: Charter schools offer no escape from the policies that concern conservative families. They must follow the same rules as traditional public schools on these issues. They have autonomy in how they teach and operate, but not in following state-mandated policies on sex education, transgender rights, or LGBTQ+ curriculum.

The Spanish-Only School Question: A Framework

Let's use a hypothetical to understand where private schools have freedom and where they don't:

Hypothetical: "I'm an American citizen of Mexican heritage. I speak some English but Spanish is my primary language. Can I start a private school in Washington State that teaches only in Spanish, not English?"

The Answer: No, But...

Why NO:

Why "BUT...":

What This Teaches Us

This hypothetical illustrates an important principle: Private schools have curriculum freedom within the framework of teaching required subjects.

Applying This to Sex Education

Just as a Spanish-language school must teach English (required subject), one might ask: Must private schools teach comprehensive sex education?

Answer: NO.

This is a critical distinction: The state requires "health" as a subject but does NOT mandate comprehensive sex education for private schools the way it does for public schools.

Religious Freedom and Constitutional Rights

Can Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists Start Private Schools?

Answer: Absolutely Yes.

The First Amendment protects religious freedom for ALL religions, not just Christianity. If Christians can start private religious schools, then so can adherents of any other faith.

All private religious schools in Washington have the same rights and the same requirements. The state cannot favor one religion over another.

What All Religious Private Schools Share

Why This Matters for Conservative Christians

Some Christian families express concern about Muslim or other non-Christian schools. However, the constitutional principle that protects Christian schools from government interference is the same principle that protects schools of all faiths.

Important Legal Principle: You cannot have religious freedom "for us but not for them." The First Amendment protects all religions equally. If the state could restrict Muslim schools, it could also restrict Christian schools. Religious freedom is an all-or-nothing proposition under the Constitution.

Understanding the Tensions

These issues create real conflicts between deeply-held values. Rather than pretend these tensions don't exist, let's acknowledge them honestly.

Perspective 1: Progressive Values

Why support these policies?

  • LGBTQ+ youth face higher rates of bullying, depression, and suicide
  • Inclusive education helps LGBTQ+ students feel seen, safe, and supported
  • Comprehensive sex education reduces teen pregnancy, STIs, and sexual assault
  • Abstinence-only education has been shown to be ineffective
  • Affirmative consent training addresses sexual assault and helps prevent it
  • Transgender students deserve equal access to facilities and activities
  • Public schools serve all students and must be welcoming to everyone
  • Historical discrimination against LGBTQ+ people requires active remediation

Perspective 2: Conservative/Religious Values

Why oppose these policies?

  • Religious beliefs teach that sex is for marriage between man and woman
  • Gender is biological and determined by God at birth, not changeable
  • Parents, not schools, should teach children about sexuality
  • Young children (K-3) are too young to learn about sex and gender identity
  • Girls' privacy and safety are compromised by males in female facilities
  • Girls' sports are undermined by biological males competing
  • Social transition may harm confused children who would otherwise desist
  • Schools hiding information from parents violates parental rights
  • This represents moral relativism that conflicts with religious truth claims

The Real Conflict

These perspectives are not easily reconciled. They represent fundamentally different understandings of:

Honest Assessment: Washington State has clearly chosen the progressive position on these issues. The I-5 corridor controls state politics, and these policies reflect those values. Families in Eastern Washington and rural areas who hold conservative or religious views find themselves subject to laws they strongly oppose. This creates genuine hardship for families who feel the state is undermining their values and parental authority.

Options for Families

Given this legal landscape, what options do families have who disagree with these policies?

Option 1: Remain in Public School

Advantages:

Limitations:

Option 2: Private School

Advantages:

Limitations:

Option 3: Homeschooling

Advantages:

Limitations:

Option 4: Charter School

Reality Check: Charter schools do NOT offer relief from these policies.

Political and Legal Remedies

Families who oppose current Washington policies have several avenues for seeking change:

State-Level Action

Local-Level Action

Federal-Level Hope?

The Trump administration (2025) has challenged some of these policies and threatened to withhold federal funding from Washington. However:

Legal Challenges

Some groups are pursuing legal challenges to these policies based on:

These legal challenges face significant obstacles in Washington State courts, which tend to be progressive.

Summary: Know Your Rights and Options

If You're in a PUBLIC SCHOOL (including charter):

If You Choose a PRIVATE SCHOOL:

If You Choose HOMESCHOOLING:

Constitutional Protections

Final Thoughts

These are difficult issues that touch on people's deepest values about family, sexuality, gender, parental authority, and religious faith. Reasonable people of good will disagree strongly.

What we can agree on:

Moving forward:

Remember: Understanding what the law requires doesn't mean you must agree with it. This page aims to provide factual information to help families navigate a complex legal landscape, not to advocate for any particular position on these deeply divisive issues.

← Back to Main Site